Skip to main content

Model comparison

Celeris-1 vs Holo2-235B-A22B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Celeris
N/A
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Celeris-1 and Holo2-235B-A22B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Celeris-1; 1 to Holo2-235B-A22B.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
Celeris-1 only
1
Holo2-235B-A22B only
1
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Celeris-1 and Holo2-235B-A22B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Holo2-235B-A22B has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 8K for Celeris-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricCeleris-1Holo2-235B-A22BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensCeleris-1$2 input / $6 outputHolo2-235B-A22BNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondCeleris-1Not availableHolo2-235B-A22BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenCeleris-1Not availableHolo2-235B-A22BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensCeleris-18KHolo2-235B-A22B262KHolo2-235B-A22B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Knowledge
BenchmarkCeleris-1Holo2-235B-A22BResult
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkCeleris-1Holo2-235B-A22BResult
ScreenSpot ProSource 70.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Celeris-1 and Holo2-235B-A22B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Celeris-1 and Holo2-235B-A22B today?

Celeris-1: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.