Skip to main content

Model comparison

Celeris-1 vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
Celeris
N/A
No comparison
Xiaomi
58.62/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Celeris-1 unranked (Not scored); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Celeris-1 and MiMo-V2.5 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Celeris-1; 11 to MiMo-V2.5.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
0
Celeris-1 only
1
MiMo-V2.5 only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Celeris-1 and MiMo-V2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 8K for Celeris-1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricCeleris-1MiMo-V2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensCeleris-1$2 input / $6 outputMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondCeleris-1Not availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenCeleris-1Not availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensCeleris-18KMiMo-V2.51MMiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkCeleris-1MiMo-V2.5Result
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkCeleris-1MiMo-V2.5Result
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkCeleris-1MiMo-V2.5Result
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkCeleris-1MiMo-V2.5Result
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1291Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Celeris-1 and MiMo-V2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Celeris-1 and MiMo-V2.5 today?

Celeris-1: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens MiMo-V2.5: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 24, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.