Long documents
Prompts that approach the documented context limit
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) has the larger documented context window.
Confidence: documented
Celeris-1 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Updated October 14, 2026. We do not rank this pair: at least one has no public score. Public scores include evidence status and uncertainty.
Both of these models will change. Get the price, version and retirement notices for the pair, each with its source. Follow model changes
Share or export
Decision reading
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. 1 results are shared. Category rows resting on Estimated evidence or different benchmark sets are marked directional and do not name a winner.
- Shared results
- 1
- Celeris-1 only
- 3
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) only
- 10
- Like-for-like categories
- 0 / 8
Estimated: Celeris-1. Conditional ranges do not establish rank confidence.How the comparison works
Which one for your work
Recommendations appear only when a shared evidence basis or an explicit operating constraint supports the call. Secondary and unsupported use cases stay disclosed below the initial list.
Show secondary and unsupported calls
Coding work
Code generation, repair, and software-engineering tasks
Not enough matched evidence
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Confidence: limitedAgentic work
Tool use, computer use, and multi-step task completion
Not enough matched evidence
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) is not ranked on the public lane for agentic, so no winner is named for agentic.
Confidence: limitedChat turn cost
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. Celeris-1 does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) has no comparable published API token rate.
Confidence: listed-ratesCache-heavy agent loop cost
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. Celeris-1 does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) does not fit this workload in one request. Celeris-1 has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate. Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) has no comparable published API token rate.
Confidence: rate-fallbackRepository review cost
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
Not enough matched evidence
The page does not recommend a cost winner because at least one model cannot fit the stated workload in one request. Celeris-1 does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) has no comparable published API token rate.
Confidence: listed-rates
Which one for a specific job
Choose a job from the LLM Selector's task catalog to see the category row it rests on, under the same basis rules as the table below. A directional row stays directional; choosing a job never creates a winner.
The same task catalog as the LLM Selector. Each job names the evidence surface it rests on; nothing here adds a new score.
11.0Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Not comparable · BenchAlign v5.8
The coding row is not comparable on the public lane: at least one model is not measured or not ranked there.
Coding scores combine specific tasks and setups. Match the editor, harness, and effort to your workflow.
Same basis rules as the category table below
What is actually comparable
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results present for only one model describe coverage, not superiority.
3 Celeris-1 only
1 Shared
10 Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) only
Shape of the matched evidence
Only shared public evidence is shown. Sparse evidence stays a ruled list rather than being closed into a radar shape.
A shared-evidence shape is not available.
BenchLM does not draw a radar or infer missing axes when the matched evidence is too sparse.
Category results, on a stated basis
Each row shows the public-lane category score for both models: the BenchAlign v5.8 lane for agentic, coding, and knowledge, and the weighted public rows elsewhere, with the same rank each model page reports. A row is like-for-like only when both scores rest on Supported evidence or the same weighted set. Directional and not-comparable rows remain visible, but they never receive a winner.
Agentic
Not comparable- Celeris-1
- 7.1
- Estimated · #120/124
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 1 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Coding
Not comparable- Celeris-1
- 11.0
- Estimated · #141/149
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 1 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Reasoning
Not comparable- Celeris-1
- 52.0
- Unranked · 3 rankable rows
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multimodal
Not comparable- Celeris-1
- Not ranked
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Knowledge
Not comparable- Celeris-1
- 28.5
- Supported · #157/181
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- BenchAlign v5.8 lane · 1 vs 4 public rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Multilingual
Not comparable- Celeris-1
- Not ranked
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Instruction following
Not comparable- Celeris-1
- Not ranked
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
Math
Not comparable- Celeris-1
- Not ranked
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- Not ranked
- Basis
- Provisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows
- Reading
- Not comparable
| Category | Celeris-1 | Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) | Basis | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | 7.1Estimated · #120/124 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 1 public rows | Not comparable |
| Coding | 11.0Estimated · #141/149 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 0 vs 1 public rows | Not comparable |
| Reasoning | 52.0Unranked · 3 rankable rows | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Multimodal | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Knowledge | 28.5Supported · #157/181 | Not ranked | Not comparableBenchAlign v5.8 lane · 1 vs 4 public rows | Not comparable |
| Multilingual | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Instruction following | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
| Math | Not ranked | Not ranked | Not comparableProvisional lane · 0 vs 0 weighted rows | Not comparable |
Ranks count the models scored in each category’s lane, so the agentic, coding, and knowledge denominators (BenchAlign v5.8) differ from the provisional-lane categories. Unranked scores sit on the provisional lane’s scale but never name a winner. Like-for-like rows within 0.5 points read as a practical tie.
Supported evidence per lane · bars run 0–100Methodology
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes turn per-token rates into comparable decisions. Each scenario states context fit and whether cached input had to fall back to the published list-input rate.
Chat turn
1K fresh input + 500 output tokens
- Celeris-1
- $0.00055
- Does not fit in one request
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Celeris-1 does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) has no comparable published API token rate.
Repository review
50K fresh input + 3K output tokens
- Celeris-1
- $0.0121
- Does not fit in one request
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- API rate not published
- Fits in one request
Celeris-1 does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) has no comparable published API token rate.
Cache-heavy agent loop
200K cached + 20K fresh input + 10K output tokens
- Celeris-1
- $0.051
- Does not fit in one request
- Cached input priced at the published list-input rate
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
- API rate not published
- Does not fit in one request
- Cached-input rate unavailable
Celeris-1 does not fit this workload in one request. Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) does not fit this workload in one request. Celeris-1 has no published cached-input rate, so cached tokens use its listed input rate. Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) has no comparable published API token rate.
Cached input falls back to the list input rate only where a cached rate is unpublished
Specification differences
Sourced differences are shown directly. Missing facts stay explicit instead of being inferred from a model name or family.
SpecificationCeleris-1Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Context window
Maximum documented context; output-token limits may be lower.
Celeris-1
131,072 tokens
Celeris-1 model guideQwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
128K
API model ID
Celeris-1
celeris-1
Celeris-1 model guideQwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Not sourced
Cached-input rate
A missing cached-input rate falls back to the listed input rate only in the stated workload estimate.
Celeris-1
Not published
Celeris API pricingQwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
No comparable hosted API rate
Documented inputs
Celeris-1
text, image
Celeris-1 model guideQwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Not sourced
Documented outputs
Celeris-1
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Not sourced
Provider availability
Celeris-1
Generally Available · Celeris OpenAI-compatible API (United States)
Celeris availabilityQwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Not sourced
Reasoning profile
Celeris-1
Non-Reasoning
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Reasoning
Weight access
Celeris-1
Proprietary
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Open Weight
License
Celeris-1
Proprietary
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
Open Weight
Release date
Celeris-1
2026-07-22
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
2025-04-29
If you already use one of these models
- Deployment change
- The models list different providers, so authentication, endpoint behavior, limits, and feature support may change.
- Quality signal
- At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner.
- Workload cost
- A complete comparable API-rate estimate is not available for both models.
- Context tradeoff
- Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) has the larger documented window (128K).
Run the same representative tasks against both endpoints before changing production traffic.
Questions
Which is better, Celeris-1 or Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)?
At least one model is not scored in the current public ranking lane, so the page does not name an overall quality winner. The page therefore keeps the decision tied to the specific documented workload.
Which is better for coding, Celeris-1 or Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)?
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) is not ranked on the public lane for coding, so no winner is named for coding.
Which is better for agentic tasks, Celeris-1 or Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)?
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) is not ranked on the public lane for agentic tasks, so no winner is named for agentic tasks.
Which costs less, Celeris-1 or Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)?
Both models do not have comparable published API token rates, so this page does not name a universal price winner.
Which has the larger context window, Celeris-1 or Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)?
Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning) has the larger documented context window: 128K, compared with 131,072 tokens.
Benchmark evidence
The full public result ledger is available for audit without forcing a wide desktop table onto a phone.
Browse raw public benchmark evidence14 rows
Agentic
BFCL v3
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)70.8%SourceNot directly comparable
Coding
LiveCodeBench v5
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)70.7%SourceNot directly comparable
Reasoning
DROP
Celeris-181.4%SourceQwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)—Not directly comparable
Knowledge
MMLU-Pro
Celeris-175.9%SourceQwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)—Not directly comparable
MMLU-Redux
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)92.7%SourceNot directly comparable
GPQA
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)71.1%SourceNot directly comparable
C-Eval
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)89.6%SourceNot directly comparable
MMMLU
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)84.3%SourceNot directly comparable
Multilingual
INCLUDE
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)78.7%SourceNot directly comparable
Instruction following
Math
GSM8K
Celeris-193.7%SourceQwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)—Not directly comparable
MATH-500
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)98%SourceNot directly comparable
AIME 2024
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)85.7%SourceNot directly comparable
AIME 2025
Celeris-1—Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)81.5%SourceNot directly comparable
14 public results · 1 shared
Watch Celeris-1 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B (Reasoning)
One weekly email when material rank, price, or benchmark evidence changes make this matchup worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 5,500+ readers.
Last updated October 14, 2026