Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

21.27/100
Margin
20.0pts
winning →
41.25/100
0 category wins0 category wins

BenchAlign evidence: Claude 3 Haiku supported; LFM2.5-8B-A1B estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 3 Haiku and LFM2.5-8B-A1B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude 3 Haiku; 6 to LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
12
Claude 3 Haiku only
1
LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 3 Haiku and LFM2.5-8B-A1B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude 3 Haiku is priced at $0.25 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for LFM2.5-8B-A1B. Claude 3 Haiku has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 3 Haiku and LFM2.5-8B-A1B
CategoryClaude 3 HaikuΔLFM2.5-8B-A1B
MathClaude 3 HaikuNot measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0
Inst. FollowingClaude 3 HaikuNot measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B68.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 3 HaikuLFM2.5-8B-A1BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 3 Haiku$0.25 input / $1.25 outputLFM2.5-8B-A1B$0 input / $0 outputLFM2.5-8B-A1B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 3 Haiku138 tok/sLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 3 Haiku1.16 sLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 3 Haiku200KLFM2.5-8B-A1B128KClaude 3 Haiku lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 21.1%16.1%Claude 3 Haiku leads
BFCL v4Source 49.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Terminal-Bench HardSource 0.8%4.5%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
AA-SciCodeSource 18.6%7.8%Claude 3 Haiku leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-LCRSource 21.0%0.0%Claude 3 Haiku leads
CritPtSource 0.0%0.0%Tie
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 3.9%8.3%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 37.4%51.3%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
AA-HLESource 3.9%6.9%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -47.6%-33.3%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 17.2%9.4%Claude 3 Haiku leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 78.2%47.0%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
Math
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
MATH-500Source 88.8%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 42.5%Not comparable
AIME26Source 50.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 30.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 3 HaikuLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 36.1%55.6%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
IFEvalSource 91.8%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 56.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 3 Haiku and LFM2.5-8B-A1B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 3 Haiku and LFM2.5-8B-A1B today?

Claude 3 Haiku: $0.25 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens LFM2.5-8B-A1B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.