Model comparison
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs Inkling
Head-to-head evidence from 7 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking unranked; Inkling #17
BenchAlign evidence: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking supported; Inkling not scored. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Inkling share 7 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 25 to Inkling.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 7
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
- 3
- Inkling only
- 25
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Inkling is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 7 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Inkling has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Δ | Inkling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling69.4 |
| Coding | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling68.6 |
| Knowledge | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling51.7 |
| Math | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling97.1 |
| Multimodal | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling76.5 |
| Inst. Following | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measured | MarginNo overlap | Inkling79.8 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Inkling | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot available | Inkling$1.87 input / $4.68 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/s | InklingNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 s | InklingNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking200K | Inkling1M | Inkling lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 71.4% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 63.8% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 77.1% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 74.1% | Not comparable |
| Design Arena Agentic Web DevSource | — | 1258 | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 32.3% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 36.9% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1239 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 836 | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 23.7% | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 34.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 40.9% | 46.1% | Inkling leads |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 77.6% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 54.3% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 63.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 52.1% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 33.7% | 40.7% | Inkling leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 80.9% | 87.2% | Inkling leads |
| AA-HLESource | 11.9% | 29.7% | Inkling leads |
| GPQASource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 87.9% | Not comparable |
| HLESource | — | 46% | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | — | 30% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | — | 2.1% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | — | 40.0% | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | — | 63.1% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Inkling | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME26Source | — | 97.1% | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Inkling on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Inkling today?
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable Inkling: $1.87 input / $4.68 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.