Skip to main content
Radar

Five or fewer confirmed AI changes, with original sources, on mornings when something changed.A free source-linked morning brief.

Start free brief

Thinking Machines Inkling model

CurrentReleased Jul 15, 2026Open WeightHybrid1M context

Released Jul 15, 2026 see all recent releases

Decision reading
Inkling scores 66.9 out of 100 and ranks #24 of 217. This profile shows 15 source-displayable benchmark rows; its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #10. API pricing is $1.87 input and $4.68 output per million tokens, with cached input at $0.374.

Data as of August 13, 2026 · How the score is built

Strongest published evidence

Instruction Following ranks #10. A well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.

Validate before choosing

15 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. Coding is its lowest eligible category at #104.

Decision snapshot

Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.

Capability

66.9/100

field median 57.7

#24 of 217 ranked models

Price

$1.87input / $4.68 output

input median $1

cached $0.37 · blended $3.27

Speed

76tok/s

field median 93 tok/s

First token 28.3 s

Context

1Mtokens

field median 200,000

Reported for this model; direct source link not stored

Capability shape

Each axis shows percentile within that category’s eligible cohort. The comparison outline is the median of the six nearest public-score peers; a collapsed vertex means the category is not rank-eligible.

Inkling category percentile values

  • Agentic49th percentile
  • Coding23rd percentile
  • ReasoningNot eligible
  • Knowledge50th percentile
  • MathNot eligible
  • MultilingualNot eligible
  • Multimodal25th percentile
  • Instruction following76th percentile

The dashed outline is median of 6 nearest peers.

Eligible category ranks

  1. Agentic#66/129
  2. Coding#104/134
  3. ReasoningNot ranked
  4. Knowledge#28/55
  5. MathNot ranked
  6. MultilingualNot ranked
  7. Multimodal#25/33
  8. Inst. Following#10/38
Top decileTop quartileMid-fieldNot eligible

What it costs to get this score

Published API price against the public score. The x-axis uses a log scale; the dashed path marks models that are not beaten by a cheaper, higher-scoring option. Price uses average of published input and output rates.

Explore all models

The chart opens on the current model. Scroll horizontally to inspect the full price axis.

Current modelInkling · 66.9 score · $3.27 blended per million tokens
405060708090$0.50$1$5$10$25↘ frontierInkling

Horizontal: blended price per million tokens, log scale · Vertical: public score

How much of this is verified

Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.

  1. Agentic3/3 verified
  2. Coding3/3 verified
  3. ReasoningNot measured
  4. Knowledge4/4 verified
  5. Math1/1 verified
  6. MultilingualNot measured
  7. Multimodal3/3 verified
  8. Inst. Following1/1 verified
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured

Spec sheet

Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.

API model ID
Not published
Context window
1M
Maximum output
Not sourced yet
Knowledge cutoff
Not sourced yet
Input modalities
Not sourced yet
Output modalities
Not sourced yet
Parameters
Not sourced yet
Availability
Not sourced yet
Cloud regions
Not tracked yet
Lifecycle
Current
API capabilities
Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
Prompt caching
Published at $0.37 per million cached input tokens
Self-host
Open weights available; hardware estimate not sourced
Rate limits
Not tracked yet

Deployment options

Self-host and provider-specific paths stay separate from benchmark evidence so operating constraints are visible before a score becomes the whole decision.

Published weights are available, but BenchLM does not yet have a sourced parameter and VRAM profile for this exact model. Hardware cost estimates stay unavailable until that sizing record is complete.

Estimate VRAM from known parameters

Category score record

Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.

Category scores, ranks, weighting, benchmark coverage, and evidence status
CategoryScore
AgenticRank #66 of 129Percentile 49thWeight 22%3 benchmarksVerified48.2
CodingRank #104 of 134Percentile 23rdWeight 20%3 benchmarksVerified42.9
ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
KnowledgeRank #28 of 55Percentile 50thWeight 12%4 benchmarksVerified69.1
MathRank Not rankedWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified78.6
MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measuredNot measured
MultimodalRank #25 of 33Percentile 25thWeight 12%3 benchmarksVerified51.1
Inst. FollowingRank #10 of 38Percentile 76thWeight 5%1 benchmarkVerified90.9

Benchmark ledger

Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.

Coding3 rows
Coding benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark VerifiedScore77.6%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96%

Gap18.4 behindWeightWeighted 16%
SWE-bench ProScore54.3%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 80.3%

Gap26 behindWeightWeighted 10%
Terminal-Bench 2.0Score63.8%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9%

Gap28.1 behindWeightDisplay only
Agentic3 rows
Agentic benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
Terminal-Bench 2.0Score63.8%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 91.9%

Gap28.1 behindWeightWeighted 38%
BrowseCompScore77.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.6 Sol · 92.2%

Gap15.1 behindWeightWeighted 28%
MCP AtlasScore74.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Muse Spark 1.1 · 88.1%

Gap14 behindWeightDisplay only
Knowledge4 rows
Knowledge benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
HLEHumanity's Last ExamScore46%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 64.7%

Gap18.7 behindWeightWeighted 45%
GPQAGraduate-Level Google-Proof Q&AScore87.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5%

Gap7.6 behindWeightWeighted 7%
GPQA-DGPQA DiamondScore87.9%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Sakana Fugu-Ultra · 95.5%

Gap7.6 behindWeightDisplay only
HLE w/o toolsHumanity's Last Exam without toolsScore30%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 59%

Gap29 behindWeightDisplay only
Math1 row
Math benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
AIME26AIME 2026Score97.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GLM-5.2 · 99.2%

Gap2.1 behindWeightWeighted 25%
Multimodal3 rows
Multimodal benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
MMMU-ProMassive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding ProScore73.5%Versus best verified row

Best verified: GPT-5.4 Pro · 94%

Gap20.5 behindWeightWeighted 45%
CharXivCharXiv ReasoningScore82%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 93.5%

Gap11.5 behindWeightWeighted 25%
CharXiv w/o toolsCharXiv Reasoning without toolsScore78.1%Versus best verified row

Best verified: Claude Mythos 5 · 88.9%

Gap10.8 behindWeightDisplay only
Inst. Following1 row
Inst. Following benchmark values, best verified comparison, weight, and source status
IFBenchInstruction Following BenchmarkScore79.8%Versus best verified row

Best verified: MAI-Thinking-1 · 85%

Gap5.2 behindWeightWeighted 65%

Lineage

The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.

Jul 15, 2026 · you are here

Inkling

Score 66.9 · $1.87 / $4.68

Base entry

How to read this profile

The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.

Inkling ranks #24 of 217 on the public leaderboard with a score of 66.88/100. Its source-verified position is #20 of 104.

Inkling is a open weight model with a 1M context window. No explicit reasoning mode is documented in this profile.

Inkling sits in the Inkling family with Inkling-Small. 15 of 431 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.

Its strongest eligible category is Instruction Following at #10, while its lowest eligible position is Coding at #104. a well-rounded choice across a range of tasks.

Radar

Inkling release history

Full release history
Inkling released

Thinking Machines Lab · Model release

Source confirmed

Frequently asked questions

How does Inkling perform overall in AI benchmarks?

Inkling ranks #24 out of 217 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 66.88/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 15 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.

Is Inkling good for knowledge and understanding?

Inkling ranks #28 out of 55 eligible models for knowledge and understanding, with a public category score of 69.1/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Inkling good for coding and programming?

Inkling ranks #104 out of 134 eligible models for coding and programming, with a public category score of 42.9/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Inkling good for mathematics?

Inkling has source-displayable benchmark coverage for mathematics, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.

Is Inkling good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?

Inkling ranks #66 out of 129 eligible models for agentic tool use and computer tasks, with a public category score of 48.2/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Inkling good for multimodal and grounded tasks?

Inkling ranks #25 out of 33 eligible models for multimodal and grounded tasks, with a public category score of 51.1/100. Higher-ranked alternatives are available for workloads where this category decides the choice. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Inkling good for instruction following?

Inkling ranks #10 out of 38 eligible models for instruction following, with a public category score of 90.9/100. That places it in the current top ten for this category. Check the underlying rows before treating the aggregate as a workload guarantee.

Is Inkling open source?

Inkling is an open-weight model from Thinking Machines Lab. Its weights can be downloaded for local or hosted deployment, subject to the published license. Open weight does not automatically mean open source: training data and training code may remain private, and commercial restrictions can still apply.

Which sibling models are related to Inkling?

Inkling belongs to the Inkling family. Related tracked variants include Inkling-Small. A sibling link indicates shared lineage or a documented configuration relationship; it does not mean the variants have identical pricing, context limits, benchmark evidence, or deployment behavior. Compare before switching.

Does Inkling have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?

No. Inkling currently has 36 source-displayable rows across 431 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.

What is the context window size of Inkling?

Inkling has a reported context window of 1M in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.

Last updated August 13, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.

Watch Inkling in the weekly brief

Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.

Read a sample issue

Join 2,000+ readers.