Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs o3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 9 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

36.55/100
Margin
11.3pts
winning →
OpenAI
47.89/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #184 (Supported); o3 #131 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and o3 share 9 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 7 to o3.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
9
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
0
o3 only
7
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and o3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 9 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and o3
CategoryClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingΔo3
MathClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapo314.5

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4.1 Opus Thinkingo3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot availableo3$2 input / $8 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/so3118 tok/so3 has the higher measured throughput.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 so35.38 so3 reaches the first token sooner.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4.1 Opus Thinking200Ko3200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus Thinkingo3Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 71.4%80.7%o3 leads
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus Thinkingo3Result
AA-SciCodeSource 40.9%41.0%o3 leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus Thinkingo3Result
AA-LCRSource 66.3%69.3%o3 leads
CritPtSource 0.0%1.1%o3 leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus Thinkingo3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 33.7%30.4%Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 80.9%82.7%o3 leads
AA-HLESource 11.9%20.0%o3 leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -15.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 38.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 87.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus Thinkingo3Result
AA MATH-500Source 99.2%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 18.685%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus Thinkingo3Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 67.9%70.1%o3 leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1069Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4.1 Opus Thinkingo3Result
AA-IFBenchSource 55.4%71.4%o3 leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and o3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and o3 today?

Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable o3: $2.00 input / $8.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.