Model comparison
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking vs Ornith-1.0-397B
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking #182 (Supported); Ornith-1.0-397B unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Ornith-1.0-397B share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking; 7 to Ornith-1.0-397B.
Updated July 17, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking only
- 10
- Ornith-1.0-397B only
- 7
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Ornith-1.0-397B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Ornith-1.0-397B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Ornith-1.0-397B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus ThinkingNot available | Ornith-1.0-397B$0 input / $0 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking29 tok/s | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking15.00 s | Ornith-1.0-397BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking200K | Ornith-1.0-397B256K | Ornith-1.0-397B lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic3 benchmarks
Coding7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 34.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 40.9% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 82.4% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 62.2% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 78.9% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 48.2% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 77.5% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge3 benchmarks
Multimodal1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 67.9% | — | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking | Ornith-1.0-397B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 55.4% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Ornith-1.0-397B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking and Ornith-1.0-397B today?
Claude 4.1 Opus Thinking: Pricing unavailable Ornith-1.0-397B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.