Skip to main content

Ornith-1.0-397B vs Ornith-1.0-9B

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Sibling matchup inside the Ornith 1.0 family.

Ornith-1.0-397B

96

VS

Ornith-1.0-9B

52

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Ornith-1.0-397B makes more sense if agentic is the priority, while Ornith-1.0-9B is the cleaner fit if its score, price, or context tradeoffs line up better with your workload.

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Ornith-1.0-397B
77.5vs43.1

+34.4 difference

Coding

Ornith-1.0-397B
82.4vs69.4

+13.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Ornith-1.0-397B

Ornith-1.0-9B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$0 / $0

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

262K

262K

Quick Verdict

Ornith-1.0-397B makes more sense if agentic is the priority, while Ornith-1.0-9B is the cleaner fit if its score, price, or context tradeoffs line up better with your workload.

Ornith-1.0-397B and Ornith-1.0-9B sit in the same Ornith 1.0 family. This page is less about two unrelated model lineages and more about how the siblings trade off on benchmark shape, token costs, and practical limits like context window.

Ornith-1.0-397B is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 96 to 52. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Ornith-1.0-397B's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 77.5 against 43.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 77.5% to 43.1%.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Ornith-1.0-397B or Ornith-1.0-9B?

Ornith-1.0-397B and Ornith-1.0-9B are sibling variants in the Ornith 1.0 family, so the right pick depends on whether you value the better benchmark line, cheaper tokens, or the larger context window. Ornith-1.0-397B is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard 96 to 52.

Which is better for coding, Ornith-1.0-397B or Ornith-1.0-9B?

Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 82.4 versus 69.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Ornith-1.0-397B or Ornith-1.0-9B?

Ornith-1.0-397B has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 77.5 versus 43.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.