Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude 4 Sonnet
50
GLM-5
67
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude 4 Sonnet unranked · GLM-5 #21
Pick GLM-5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 4 Sonnet only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Coding
+9.5 difference
Claude 4 Sonnet
GLM-5
$3 / $15
$1 / $3.2
40 t/s
74 t/s
1.33s
1.64s
200K
200K
Pick GLM-5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 4 Sonnet only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
GLM-5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 67 to 50. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude 4 Sonnet is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.00 input / $3.20 output per 1M tokens for GLM-5. That is roughly 4.7x on output cost alone.
GLM-5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 67 to 50. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 72.7% and 77.8%.
Claude 4 Sonnet has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.7 versus 63.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench Hard is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.