Model comparison
Claude 4 Sonnet vs Llama 4 Behemoth
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4 Sonnet #158 (Supported); Llama 4 Behemoth #176 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude 4 Sonnet and Llama 4 Behemoth share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Claude 4 Sonnet; 0 to Llama 4 Behemoth.
Updated July 22, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude 4 Sonnet only
- 16
- Llama 4 Behemoth only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude 4 Sonnet and Llama 4 Behemoth is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Llama 4 Behemoth yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Claude 4 Sonnet is priced at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Llama 4 Behemoth. Claude 4 Sonnet has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for Llama 4 Behemoth.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude 4 Sonnet | Llama 4 Behemoth | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude 4 Sonnet$3 input / $15 output | Llama 4 Behemoth$0 input / $0 output | Llama 4 Behemoth has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude 4 Sonnet40 tok/s | Llama 4 BehemothNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude 4 Sonnet1.33 s | Llama 4 BehemothNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude 4 Sonnet200K | Llama 4 Behemoth32K | Claude 4 Sonnet lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic3 benchmarks
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4 Sonnet | Llama 4 Behemoth | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 25.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 68.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 4.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -9.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 22.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 40.8% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude 4 Sonnet | Llama 4 Behemoth | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 45.4% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude 4 Sonnet and Llama 4 Behemoth on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude 4 Sonnet and Llama 4 Behemoth today?
Claude 4 Sonnet: $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens Llama 4 Behemoth: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.