Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude 4 Sonnet vs Moonshot v1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
42.79/100
No comparison
Moonshot AI
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude 4 Sonnet #158 (Supported); Moonshot v1 #148 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude 4 Sonnet and Moonshot v1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Claude 4 Sonnet; 0 to Moonshot v1.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude 4 Sonnet only
16
Moonshot v1 only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude 4 Sonnet and Moonshot v1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Moonshot v1 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Claude 4 Sonnet has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Moonshot v1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude 4 SonnetMoonshot v1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude 4 Sonnet$3 input / $15 outputMoonshot v1Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude 4 Sonnet40 tok/sMoonshot v1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude 4 Sonnet1.33 sMoonshot v1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude 4 Sonnet200KMoonshot v1128KClaude 4 Sonnet lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetMoonshot v1Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 52.3%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 39.66%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 18.4%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetMoonshot v1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 72.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 37.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetMoonshot v1Result
AA-LCRSource 44.3%Not comparable
CritPtSource 1.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetMoonshot v1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 25.5%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -9.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 40.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetMoonshot v1Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 62.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1175Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude 4 SonnetMoonshot v1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 45.4%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude 4 Sonnet and Moonshot v1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude 4 Sonnet and Moonshot v1 today?

Claude 4 Sonnet: $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens Moonshot v1: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.