Skip to main content

Claude Fable 5 vs MAI-Thinking-1

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Fable 5

96

VS

MAI-Thinking-1

65

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Fable 5 #2 · MAI-Thinking-1 #24

Pick Claude Fable 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Fable 5
85.2vs46

+39.2 difference

Coding

Claude Fable 5
85.6vs71

+14.6 difference

Knowledge

Claude Fable 5
74.8vs69.9

+4.9 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Fable 5

MAI-Thinking-1

Price (per 1M tokens)

$10 / $50

N/A

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M+

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Fable 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MAI-Thinking-1 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Claude Fable 5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 96 to 65. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Fable 5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 85.2 against 46. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 84.3% to 46%.

Claude Fable 5 gives you the larger context window at 1M+, compared with 256K for MAI-Thinking-1.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or MAI-Thinking-1?

Claude Fable 5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 96 to 65. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 84.3% and 46%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Fable 5 or MAI-Thinking-1?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 69.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Fable 5 or MAI-Thinking-1?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 85.6 versus 71. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Fable 5 or MAI-Thinking-1?

Claude Fable 5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 85.2 versus 46. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 9, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.