Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
57.44/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking #69 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking share 2 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking; 14 to Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
2
Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking only
0
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking only
14
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinking200KClaude Opus 4.5 Thinking200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 89.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 11.39%20.63%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-SciCodeSource 49.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingResult
AA-LCRSource 74.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 4.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 28.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 13.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 45.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 59.8%Not comparable
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.5%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 91.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11521277Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.0%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingResult
AA-IFBenchSource 58.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.