Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking vs DeepSeek V3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
DeepSeek
44.97/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); DeepSeek V3 #147 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and DeepSeek V3 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking; 21 to DeepSeek V3.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking only
1
DeepSeek V3 only
21
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and DeepSeek V3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and DeepSeek V3
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingΔDeepSeek V3
CodingClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapDeepSeek V338.9
KnowledgeClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapDeepSeek V372.7
MathClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapDeepSeek V31.7
Inst. FollowingClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapDeepSeek V386.1

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingDeepSeek V3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableDeepSeek V3$0.27 input / $1.1 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableDeepSeek V3Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableDeepSeek V3Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinking200KDeepSeek V3128KClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinking lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingDeepSeek V3Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 1.6%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 22.8%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 0.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 217Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingDeepSeek V3Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 11.39%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource 37.6%Not comparable
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 42%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 23.0%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 35.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingDeepSeek V3Result
AA-LCRSource 29.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingDeepSeek V3Result
GPQASource 59.1%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 75.9%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.2%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 55.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 3.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -41.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 25.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 89.4%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingDeepSeek V3Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 1.724%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingDeepSeek V3Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11521150Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingDeepSeek V3Result
IFEvalSource 86.1%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource 34.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and DeepSeek V3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and DeepSeek V3 today?

DeepSeek V3: $0.27 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking
API / mo$0
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
DeepSeek V3
API / mo$1,028
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even1.2B/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.