Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking vs Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning)

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) #76 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking; 12 to Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning).

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking only
1
Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) only
12
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) has the larger context window at 2M, compared with 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinking200KGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)2MGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning) lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 65.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 11.39%0.00%Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-SciCodeSource 44.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-LCRSource 64.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 2.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 27.4%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 84.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 17.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -28.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 22.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 66.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1152Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 61.8%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingGrok 4 Fast (Reasoning)Result
AA-IFBenchSource 50.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and Grok 4 Fast (Reasoning) on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.