Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No comparison
Xiaomi
58.62/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and MiMo-V2.5 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 1 result is unique to Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking; 10 to MiMo-V2.5.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking only
1
MiMo-V2.5 only
10
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and MiMo-V2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

MiMo-V2.5 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and MiMo-V2.5
CategoryClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingΔMiMo-V2.5
AgenticClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.565.8
CodingClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.556.1
MultimodalClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.579.0

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingNot availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5 Thinking200KMiMo-V2.51MMiMo-V2.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2.5Result
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 46.89%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource 16.9%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2.5Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 11.39%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5 ThinkingMiMo-V2.5Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 11521291MiMo-V2.5 leads
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and MiMo-V2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Haiku 4.5 Thinking and MiMo-V2.5 today?

MiMo-V2.5: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.