Skip to main content

Claude Mythos 5 vs Qwen3.6-27B

Head-to-head comparison across 4benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Mythos 5

99

VS

Qwen3.6-27B

72

4 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Mythos 5 #1 · Qwen3.6-27B #20

Pick Claude Mythos 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Mythos 5
87vs59.3

+27.7 difference

Coding

Claude Mythos 5
85.9vs70.6

+15.3 difference

Knowledge

Claude Mythos 5
74.6vs62.2

+12.4 difference

Multimodal

Claude Mythos 5
92.7vs76.6

+16.1 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Mythos 5

Qwen3.6-27B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$10 / $50

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M+

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Mythos 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.6-27B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Mythos 5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 99 to 72. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Mythos 5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 87 against 59.3. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 64.5% to 24%.

Claude Mythos 5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $10.00 input / $50.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.6-27B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Claude Mythos 5 gives you the larger context window at 1M+, compared with 262K for Qwen3.6-27B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.6-27B?

Claude Mythos 5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 99 to 72. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 64.5% and 24%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.6-27B?

Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.6 versus 62.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.6-27B?

Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 85.9 versus 70.6. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.6-27B?

Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 59.3. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.6-27B?

Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 92.7 versus 76.6. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Claude Mythos 5
API / mo$45,000
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Qwen3.6-27B
API / mo$0
Self-host / mo$429
Break-even
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 9, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.