Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Mythos 5
99
Qwen3.7 Max
91
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Mythos 5 #1 · Qwen3.7 Max #3
Pick Claude Mythos 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.7 Max only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Agentic
+17.3 difference
Coding
+12.3 difference
Knowledge
+3.4 difference
Claude Mythos 5
Qwen3.7 Max
$10 / $50
$null / $null
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M+
1M
Pick Claude Mythos 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.7 Max only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Claude Mythos 5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 99 to 91. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude Mythos 5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 87 against 69.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 64.5% to 41.4%.
Claude Mythos 5 gives you the larger context window at 1M+, compared with 1M for Qwen3.7 Max.
Claude Mythos 5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 99 to 91. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 64.5% and 41.4%.
Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.6 versus 71.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 85.9 versus 73.6. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 69.7. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.