Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Claude Mythos 5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 3 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

83.01/100
Margin
11.1pts
← winning
71.91/100
4 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Mythos 5 #2 (Supported); Qwen3.7 Max #13 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Mythos 5 and Qwen3.7 Max share 6 comparable benchmark results. 4 of 8 categories are comparable. 9 results are unique to Claude Mythos 5; 51 to Qwen3.7 Max.

Updated July 24, 2026
Shared results
6
Claude Mythos 5 only
9
Qwen3.7 Max only
51
Comparable categories
4 / 8

Pick Claude Mythos 5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.7 Max only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 3 evidence categories; 4 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

Claude Mythos 5 is clearly ahead on the BenchAlign aggregate, 83.01 to 71.91. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Mythos 5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 87 against 69.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is HLE, 64.5% to 41.4%.

Claude Mythos 5 gives you the larger context window at 1M+, compared with 1M for Qwen3.7 Max.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Mythos 5 and Qwen3.7 Max
CategoryClaude Mythos 5ΔQwen3.7 Max
AgenticClaude Mythos 587.0Margin← 17.3Qwen3.7 Max69.7
CodingClaude Mythos 589.7Margin← 11.8Qwen3.7 Max77.9
KnowledgeClaude Mythos 568.5Margin← 4.3Qwen3.7 Max64.2
MathClaude Mythos 597.6Margin← 0.5Qwen3.7 Max97.1
ReasoningClaude Mythos 5Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max90.4
MultilingualClaude Mythos 5Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max87.0
MultimodalClaude Mythos 593.5MarginNo overlapQwen3.7 MaxNot measured
Inst. FollowingClaude Mythos 5Not measuredMarginNo overlapQwen3.7 Max84.4

Decisive benchmark drivers

The largest measured benchmark gaps in this matchup, with exact reported values.

More
A · Claude Mythos 5B · Qwen3.7 Max

  1. HLE

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 64.5%B 41.4%
    Winner: Claude Mythos 5Δ 23.1
    HLE: Claude Mythos 5 scored 64.5%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 41.4%. Claude Mythos 5 wins this benchmark.

  2. SWE-bench Pro

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 80.3%B 60.6%
    Winner: Claude Mythos 5Δ 19.7
    SWE-bench Pro: Claude Mythos 5 scored 80.3%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 60.6%. Claude Mythos 5 wins this benchmark.

  3. Terminal-Bench 2.0

    Agentic
    Source ↗
    A 88%B 69.7%
    Winner: Claude Mythos 5Δ 18.3
    Terminal-Bench 2.0: Claude Mythos 5 scored 88%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 69.7%. Claude Mythos 5 wins this benchmark.

  4. SWE-bench Verified

    Coding
    Source ↗
    A 95.5%B 80.4%
    Winner: Claude Mythos 5Δ 15.1
    SWE-bench Verified: Claude Mythos 5 scored 95.5%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 80.4%. Claude Mythos 5 wins this benchmark.

  5. GPQA

    Knowledge
    Source ↗
    A 94.1%B 92.4%
    Winner: Claude Mythos 5Δ 1.7
    GPQA: Claude Mythos 5 scored 94.1%; Qwen3.7 Max scored 92.4%. Claude Mythos 5 wins this benchmark.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Mythos 5Qwen3.7 MaxComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Mythos 5$10 input / $50 outputQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Mythos 5Not availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Mythos 5Not availableQwen3.7 MaxNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Mythos 51M+Qwen3.7 Max1MClaude Mythos 5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

AgenticClaude Mythos 5 wins
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5Qwen3.7 MaxResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 88%69.7%Claude Mythos 5 leads
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 85%—Not comparable
BrowseCompSource 88%—Not comparable
ExploitGymSource 17.5%—Not comparable
QwenClawBenchSource —64.3%Not comparable
QwenWebBenchSource —1568Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource —65.2%Not comparable
BFCL v4Source —75.0%Not comparable
MCP AtlasSource —76.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource —47.9%Not comparable
HLE w/ toolsSource —53.5%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource —30.6%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource —94.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —38.6%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource —1271Not comparable
Gert LabsSource —64.27%Not comparable
ResearchClawBenchSource —18.7%Not comparable
AA BriefcaseSource —912Not comparable
AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource —45.0%Not comparable
AA ITBenchSource —42.5%Not comparable
terminalBenchHardSource —50.8%Not comparable
aaTerminalBench21Source —74.5%Not comparable
AA Harvey LABSource —83.4%Not comparable
CodingClaude Mythos 5 wins
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5Qwen3.7 MaxResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 95.5%80.4%Claude Mythos 5 leads
SWE-bench ProSource 80.3%60.6%Claude Mythos 5 leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 88.0%69.7%Claude Mythos 5 leads
SWE MultilingualSource —78.3%Not comparable
NL2RepoSource —47.2%Not comparable
SciCodeSource —53.5%Not comparable
LiveCodeBenchSource —91.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource —66.0%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource —48.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5Qwen3.7 MaxResult
MRCRv2Source —90.4%Not comparable
CritPtSource —13.4%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource —69.0%Not comparable
KnowledgeClaude Mythos 5 wins
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5Qwen3.7 MaxResult
GPQASource 94.1%92.4%Claude Mythos 5 leads
HLESource 64.5%41.4%Claude Mythos 5 leads
HLE w/o toolsSource 59%—Not comparable
GPQA-DSource —92.4%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource —89.6%Not comparable
MMLU-ReduxSource —95%Not comparable
SuperGPQASource —73.6%Not comparable
MMMLUSource —90.3%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource —46.0%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource —92.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource —38.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource —14.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource —30.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource —22.9%Not comparable
MathClaude Mythos 5 wins
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5Qwen3.7 MaxResult
USAMO 2026Source 97.6%—Not comparable
HMMT Feb 2026Source —97.1%Not comparable
IMOAnswerBenchSource —90.0%Not comparable
ApexSource —44.5%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5Qwen3.7 MaxResult
SWE MultilingualSource 92.2%—Not comparable
MMLU-ProXSource —87%Not comparable
NOVA-63Source —59.0%Not comparable
INCLUDESource —86.2%Not comparable
MAXIFESource —89.2%Not comparable
PolyMathSource —86.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5Qwen3.7 MaxResult
SWE-bench MultimodalSource 54.9%—Not comparable
CharXivSource 93.5%—Not comparable
CharXiv w/o toolsSource 88.9%—Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource —1293Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Mythos 5Qwen3.7 MaxResult
IFEvalSource —94.3%Not comparable
IFBenchSource —79.1%Not comparable
AA-IFBenchSource —80.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (5)

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Mythos 5 is ahead on BenchLM's BenchAlign leaderboard, 83.01 to 71.91. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HLE, where the scores are 64.5% and 41.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.5 versus 64.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 89.7 versus 77.9. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 97.6 versus 97.1. Qwen3.7 Max stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Mythos 5 or Qwen3.7 Max?

Claude Mythos 5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 87 versus 69.7. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Anthropic Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 24, 2026