Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.44/100
No comparison
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking #69 (Estimated); Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking share 2 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 14 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking; 0 to Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
2
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking only
14
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.5 Thinking200KClaude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking200KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 89.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 20.63%22.62%Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-SciCodeSource 49.5%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingResult
AA-LCRSource 74.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 4.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.8%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.6%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 28.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 13.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 45.7%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 59.8%Not comparable
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.5%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 91.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.0%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12771219Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingClaude Sonnet 4.5 ThinkingResult
AA-IFBenchSource 58.0%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (2)

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and Claude Sonnet 4.5 Thinking on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.