Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs DeepSeek Coder 2.0
Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking #69 (Estimated); DeepSeek Coder 2.0 #114 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and DeepSeek Coder 2.0 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 16 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking; 0 to DeepSeek Coder 2.0.
Updated July 23, 2026- Shared results
- 0
- Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking only
- 16
- DeepSeek Coder 2.0 only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and DeepSeek Coder 2.0 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for DeepSeek Coder 2.0 yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek Coder 2.0.
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | DeepSeek Coder 2.0 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot available | DeepSeek Coder 2.0Not available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot available | DeepSeek Coder 2.0Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot available | DeepSeek Coder 2.0Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking200K | DeepSeek Coder 2.0128K | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | DeepSeek Coder 2.0 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 89.5% | — | Not comparable |
Coding2 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | DeepSeek Coder 2.0 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 40.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 86.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 28.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 13.3% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 45.7% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 59.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA MMLU-ProSource | 89.5% | — | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | DeepSeek Coder 2.0 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource | 91.3% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking | DeepSeek Coder 2.0 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 58.0% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and DeepSeek Coder 2.0 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and DeepSeek Coder 2.0 today?
DeepSeek Coder 2.0: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.