Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs GPT-5.3 Codex

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.44/100
Margin
9.3pts
winning →
66.69/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking #69 (Estimated); GPT-5.3 Codex #26 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.3 Codex share 14 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 2 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking; 7 to GPT-5.3 Codex.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
14
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking only
2
GPT-5.3 Codex only
7
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.3 Codex is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

GPT-5.3 Codex has the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.3 Codex
CategoryClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingΔGPT-5.3 Codex
AgenticClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.3 Codex71.4
CodingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapGPT-5.3 Codex67.2

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.3 CodexComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGPT-5.3 Codex$1.75 input / $14 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGPT-5.3 Codex79 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableGPT-5.3 Codex88.26 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.5 Thinking200KGPT-5.3 Codex400KGPT-5.3 Codex lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.3 CodexResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 89.5%86%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 77.3%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 64.7%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 57.47%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 33.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.3 CodexResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 20.63%61.77%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-SciCodeSource 49.5%53.2%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 85%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 56.8%Not comparable
SWE-RebenchSource 58.2%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.3 CodexResult
AA-LCRSource 74.0%74.0%Tie
CritPtSource 4.6%16.9%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.3 CodexResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.8%44.3%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.6%91.5%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-HLESource 28.4%39.9%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 13.3%9.9%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 45.7%51.8%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 59.8%86.9%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.5%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.3 CodexResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 91.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.3 CodexResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.0%78.5%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12771193Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingGPT-5.3 CodexResult
AA-IFBenchSource 58.0%75.4%GPT-5.3 Codex leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.3 Codex on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and GPT-5.3 Codex today?

GPT-5.3 Codex: $1.75 input / $14.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.