Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking vs LFM2.5-8B-A1B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 5 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

57.37/100
Margin
16.1pts
← winning
41.25/100
0 category wins0 category wins

BenchAlign evidence: Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking estimated; LFM2.5-8B-A1B estimated. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and LFM2.5-8B-A1B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking; 6 to LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Updated July 16, 2026
Shared results
12
Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking only
5
LFM2.5-8B-A1B only
6
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and LFM2.5-8B-A1B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 5 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for LFM2.5-8B-A1B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and LFM2.5-8B-A1B
CategoryClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingΔLFM2.5-8B-A1B
MathClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B50.0
Inst. FollowingClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot measuredMarginNo overlapLFM2.5-8B-A1B68.8

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingLFM2.5-8B-A1BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableLFM2.5-8B-A1B$0 input / $0 outputA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingNot availableLFM2.5-8B-A1BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.5 Thinking200KLFM2.5-8B-A1B128KClaude Opus 4.5 Thinking lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 89.5%16.1%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
BFCL v4Source 49.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Vibe Code BenchSource 20.63%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench HardSource 47.0%4.5%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-SciCodeSource 49.5%7.8%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-LCRSource 74.0%0.0%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
CritPtSource 4.6%0.0%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 40.8%8.3%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 86.6%51.3%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-HLESource 28.4%6.9%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 13.3%-33.3%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 45.7%9.4%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 59.8%47.0%LFM2.5-8B-A1B leads
AA MMLU-ProSource 89.5%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
MATH-500Source 88.8%Not comparable
AIME 2025Source 42.5%Not comparable
AIME26Source 50.0%Not comparable
Multilingual
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource 91.3%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-MMMU-ProSource 74.0%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1281Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5 ThinkingLFM2.5-8B-A1BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 58.0%55.6%Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking leads
IFEvalSource 91.8%Not comparable
IFBenchSource 56.5%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and LFM2.5-8B-A1B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Opus 4.5 Thinking and LFM2.5-8B-A1B today?

LFM2.5-8B-A1B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.