Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) vs GLM-4.7
Head-to-head comparison across 0benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Verdict
GLM-4.7 leads for most workloads.
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) offers ~5× the context window — choose it for very long inputs.
Based on BenchLM composite scores, July 2026.
Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)
24
GLM-4.7
63
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) unranked · GLM-4.7 #34
Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) and GLM-4.7 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Category Radar
Head-to-Head by Category
Operational Comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)
GLM-4.7
N/A
$0 / $0
N/A
82 t/s
N/A
1.10s
1M
200K
Quick Verdict
Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) and GLM-4.7 is coming soon on BenchLM.
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for GLM-4.7.
Benchmark Deep Dive
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) and GLM-4.7 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) and GLM-4.7 today?
GLM-4.7: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.