Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) vs MiniMax M3
Head-to-head evidence from 14 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) unranked; MiniMax M3 #18
BenchAlign evidence: Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) estimated; MiniMax M3 supported. Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) and MiniMax M3 share 14 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 3 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive); 31 to MiniMax M3.
Updated July 16, 2026- Shared results
- 14
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) only
- 3
- MiniMax M3 only
- 31
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) and MiniMax M3 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 14 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) | Δ | MiniMax M3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M372.3 |
| Coding | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M372.2 |
| Math | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M385.7 |
| Multimodal | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Not measured | MarginNo overlap | MiniMax M364.9 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) | MiniMax M3 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Not available | MiniMax M3$0.3 input / $1.2 output | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Not available | MiniMax M3Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)Not available | MiniMax M3Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive)1M | MiniMax M31M | Listed context windows are equal. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic17 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents-AASource | 33.0% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 92.1% | 88.9% | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) leads |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 66% | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | — | 83.5% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | — | 70.1% | Not comparable |
| MCP AtlasSource | — | 74.2% | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | — | 74.5% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 35.4% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 44.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1395 | Not comparable |
| GDPval rubricsSource | — | 74.7% | Not comparable |
| BankerToolBenchSource | — | 76.1% | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | — | 19.8% | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | — | 4.6% | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 1110 | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 32.1% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 6.7% | Not comparable |
Coding12 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 53.50% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench HardSource | 46.2% | 42.4% | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) leads |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 51.9% | 45.4% | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) leads |
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | — | 80.5% | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 59% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 66.0% | Not comparable |
| NL2RepoSource | — | 42.1% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 58.6% | Not comparable |
| VIBE V2Source | — | 50.1% | Not comparable |
| SVG-BenchSource | — | 63.7% | Not comparable |
| KernelBench HardSource | — | 28.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Source | — | 65.2% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 43.7% | 44.4% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 89.6% | 92.9% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 36.7% | 37.1% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 13.5% | 1.4% | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 46.4% | 15.0% | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 61.3% | 16.1% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| AA Openness IndexSource | — | 33.3% | Not comparable |
Math1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| USAMO 2026Source | — | 85.7% | Not comparable |
Multilingual1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Global-MMLU-LiteSource | 92.2% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 75.4% | 78.6% | MiniMax M3 leads |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1330 | 1294 | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) leads |
| OfficeQA ProSource | — | 45.1% | Not comparable |
| OmniDocBench 1.5Source | — | 91.6% | Not comparable |
| MMMU-ProSource | — | 78.1% | Not comparable |
| VideoMMMUSource | — | 84.6% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (with subtitle)Source | — | 85.4% | Not comparable |
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) | MiniMax M3 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 53.1% | 82.9% | MiniMax M3 leads |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) and MiniMax M3 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Opus 4.6 (Adaptive) and MiniMax M3 today?
MiniMax M3: $0.30 input / $1.20 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.