Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.6

87

VS

DeepSeek V3

36

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.6 #4 · DeepSeek V3 unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Claude Opus 4.6
64.4vs39.2

+25.2 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.6
76.2vs70

+6.2 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.6

DeepSeek V3

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$0.27 / $1.1

Speed

40 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.78s

N/A

Context Window

1M

128K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.6 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Opus 4.6 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 87 to 36. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.6's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 64.4 against 39.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 80.8% to 42%.

Claude Opus 4.6 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.27 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3. That is roughly 22.7x on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.6 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V3?

Claude Opus 4.6 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 87 to 36. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 80.8% and 42%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V3?

Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.2 versus 70. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.6 or DeepSeek V3?

Claude Opus 4.6 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.4 versus 39.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Claude Opus 4.6
API / mo$22,500
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
DeepSeek V3
API / mo$1,028
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even1.2B/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 1, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.