Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.6 #16 (Supported); Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber unranked (Not scored). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 45 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.6; 0 to Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber.
Updated July 24, 2026- Shared results
- 1
- Claude Opus 4.6 only
- 45
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.6 | Δ | Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Claude Opus 4.673.0 | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot measured |
| Coding | Claude Opus 4.668.1 | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot measured |
| Knowledge | Claude Opus 4.669.1 | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot measured |
| Math | Claude Opus 4.636.3 | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot measured |
| Multimodal | Claude Opus 4.677.3 | MarginNo overlap | Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude Opus 4.6$5 input / $25 output | Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot available | A complete price comparison is not available. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude Opus 4.640 tok/s | Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude Opus 4.61.78 s | Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude Opus 4.61M | Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberNot available | A complete context comparison is not available. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic10 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | 65.4% | — | Not comparable |
| BrowseCompSource | 83.7% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld-VerifiedSource | 72.7% | — | Not comparable |
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 84.8% | — | Not comparable |
| Claw-EvalSource | 70.4% | — | Not comparable |
| DeepSearchQASource | 73.7% | — | Not comparable |
| CyberGymSource | 66.6% | 83.2% | Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 61.85% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 19.9% | — | Not comparable |
| JobBenchSource | 36.7% | — | Not comparable |
Coding9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSource | 80.8% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench Verified*Source | 75.6% | — | Not comparable |
| LiveCodeBench ProSource | 70.7% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | 53.4% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-RebenchSource | 65.3% | — | Not comparable |
| React Native EvalsSource | 84.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 57.57% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 45.7% | — | Not comparable |
| FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource | 26.9% | — | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge15 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQASource | 91.3% | — | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | 89.2% | — | Not comparable |
| SuperGPQASource | 95% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-ProSource | 82% | — | Not comparable |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee)Source | 89.1% | — | Not comparable |
| HLESource | 53% | — | Not comparable |
| HLE w/o toolsSource | 40% | — | Not comparable |
| HealthBench HardSource | 14.8% | — | Not comparable |
| MedXpertQA (Text)Source | 52.1% | — | Not comparable |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 37.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 84.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-HLESource | 18.6% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 3.5% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 45.2% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 76.0% | — | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal6 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 44.6% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber today?
Claude Opus 4.6: $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Choose a model with this week’s evidence
Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.