Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
90
Exaone 4.0 32B
66
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #5 · Exaone 4.0 32B unranked
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
Knowledge
+13.6 difference
Math
+41.5 difference
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Exaone 4.0 32B
$5 / $25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
128K
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Exaone 4.0 32B only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 90 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Exaone 4.0 32B.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 90 to 66.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.8 versus 68.2. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Exaone 4.0 32B has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 85.3 versus 43.8. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.