Head-to-head comparison across 1benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
85
MiMo-V2-Omni
83
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #8 · MiMo-V2-Omni unranked
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Omni only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Coding
+1.9 difference
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
MiMo-V2-Omni
$5 / $25
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1M
262K
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiMo-V2-Omni only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the cleaner provisional overall profile here, landing at 85 versus 83. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for MiMo-V2-Omni.
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 85 to 83. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 87.6% and 74.8%.
MiMo-V2-Omni has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 72.9. Inside this category, AA-SciCode is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.