Capability
62.2/100
field median 57.3
#43 of 214 ranked models
Superseded.Xiaomi has newer models in this line:MiMo-V2.5
Model profile · Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni scores 62.2 out of 100 and ranks #43 of 214. This profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows. No comparable first-party API price is published in the catalog.
Data as of August 1, 2026 · How the score is built
Strongest published evidence
Published rows are visible, but no category has enough eligible evidence for a comparative rank.
Validate before choosing
2 published rows leave some tracked benchmark slots empty. No comparable first-party API token rate is published.
Decision snapshot
Each value carries a field reference instead of floating alone. Markers compare this model with the current ranked and priced catalog; they are not absolute quality thresholds.
Price
Not listed
input median $1
No comparable first-party hosted token rate
Speed
Not measured
field median 108 tok/s
Time to first token not measured
Context
262Ktokens
field median 256,000
Reported for this model; direct source link not stored
How much of this is verified
Coverage is split by category so a strong number never hides a thin evidence base. Verified means the row is tied to a published source; provisional rows remain visible but separate.
- Agentic1/1 verified
- Coding0/1 verified
- ReasoningNot measured
- KnowledgeNot measured
- MathNot measured
- MultilingualNot measured
- MultimodalNot measured
- Inst. FollowingNot measured
Verified sourceProvisionalNot measured
Spec sheet
Each documented value carries its source. Missing fields stay visible as not sourced or not published, rather than disappearing from the page.
- API model ID
- Not published
- Context window
- 262K
- Maximum output
- Not sourced yet
- Knowledge cutoff
- Not sourced yet
- Input modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Output modalities
- Not sourced yet
- Parameters
- Not disclosed by the provider
- Availability
- Not sourced yet
- Cloud regions
- Not tracked yet
- Lifecycle
- Superseded
- API capabilities
- Tool calling, structured outputs, and batch support are not tracked yet
- Prompt caching
- Not documented in the pricing record
- Self-host
- Weights are not published
- Rate limits
- Not tracked yet
Category score record
Scores and ranks appear only where published evidence can be displayed. The table keeps the score, weight, cohort, and evidence state together.
| Category | Score | Rank | Percentile | Weight | Benchmarks | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AgenticWeight 22%1 benchmarkVerified | Score pending | Not ranked | Not available | 22% | 1 benchmark | Verified |
| CodingRank Not rankedWeight 20%1 benchmarkReported | 74.8 | Not ranked | Not available | 20% | 1 benchmark | Reported |
| ReasoningWeight 17%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 17% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| KnowledgeWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MathWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultilingualWeight 7%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 7% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| MultimodalWeight 12%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 12% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
| Inst. FollowingWeight 5%0 benchmarksNot measured | Not measured | Not ranked | Not available | 5% | 0 benchmarks | Not measured |
Benchmark ledger
Coding opens by default. The marker compares each value with the best source-verified result in the catalog; provisional leaders do not set the reference. Expand the remaining categories for every published row.
Coding1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench VerifiedSoftware Engineering Benchmark Verified | Score74.8% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Claude Opus 5 · 96% | Gap21.2 behind | WeightWeighted 16% | Reported |
Agentic1 row
| Benchmark | Score | Versus best verified row | Gap | Weight | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claw-Eval | Score45.2% | Versus best verified row Best verified: Ornith-1.0-397B · 77.1% | Gap31.9 behind | WeightDisplay only | Benchmark exact |
Lineage
The sequence follows explicit supersedes links. Scores and prices remain blank when the corresponding public row or first-party rate is unavailable.
Mar 18, 2026 · you are here
MiMo-V2-OmniScore 62.2 · Price not listed
Apr 22, 2026
MiMo-V2.5Score 57.9 · Price not listed
Base entry
How to read this profile
The visual layer above carries the decisions. These notes preserve the model, ranking, coverage, and family context behind the numbers.
MiMo-V2-Omni ranks #43 of 214 on the public leaderboard with a score of 62.16/100. Its source-verified position is #34 of 103.
MiMo-V2-Omni is a proprietary model with a 262K context window. It uses an explicit reasoning mode, which can improve complex problem solving while adding latency and token use.
Current sparse exact-value snapshot should be treated as provisional until Xiaomi publishes a primary benchmark table for MiMo-V2-Omni.
2 of 376 tracked benchmark slots currently have displayable evidence. Missing categories stay blank.
Radar
Full release historyMiMo-V2-Omni release history
MiMo-V2-Pro and MiMo-V2-Omni released
Xiaomi · Model release
Source confirmed
Frequently asked questions
How does MiMo-V2-Omni perform overall in AI benchmarks?
MiMo-V2-Omni ranks #43 out of 214 models on the public BenchAlign leaderboard, with a score of 62.16/100. Its evidence status is Supported, and this profile shows 2 source-displayable benchmark rows. The label describes evidence depth, not a provider quality claim; inspect category rows before choosing a workload.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni good for coding and programming?
MiMo-V2-Omni has source-displayable benchmark coverage for coding and programming, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni good for agentic tool use and computer tasks?
MiMo-V2-Omni has source-displayable benchmark coverage for agentic tool use and computer tasks, but the public category table does not assign it a rank there. The individual rows remain available for inspection. A missing category position means the evidence threshold was not met; it does not convert the model's unmeasured work into a zero.
Does MiMo-V2-Omni have full benchmark coverage on BenchLM?
No. MiMo-V2-Omni currently has 14 source-displayable rows across 376 tracked benchmark slots. The profile exposes published, non-generated evidence and leaves missing categories blank until an exact evaluation is available. Coverage describes how much was measured; it is not a penalty added to an individual benchmark result.
What is the context window size of MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni has a reported context window of 262K in the exact-model catalog record. The value stays visible, but the profile marks its source link as unavailable instead of presenting it as directly documented. Maximum output length remains separate because providers often publish a different limit.
Last updated August 1, 2026. Runtime fields remain blank until a sourced snapshot exists.
Watch MiMo-V2-Omni in the weekly brief
Get one weekly email when material rank, price, availability, or benchmark evidence changes are worth revisiting.
Read a sample issueJoin 2,000+ readers.