Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) vs Ornith-1.0-9B

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

83

VS

Ornith-1.0-9B

52

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) #10 · Ornith-1.0-9B unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-9B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
74.9vs43.1

+31.8 difference

Coding

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
72.9vs69.4

+3.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)

Ornith-1.0-9B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

N/A

Latency (first answer)

N/A

N/A

Context Window

1M

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ornith-1.0-9B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 52. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)'s sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 74.9 against 43.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 69.4% to 43.1%.

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Ornith-1.0-9B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 262K for Ornith-1.0-9B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Ornith-1.0-9B?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 83 to 52. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 69.4% and 43.1%.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Ornith-1.0-9B?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 69.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) or Ornith-1.0-9B?

Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.9 versus 43.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 29, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.