Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Grok 4.5
Head-to-head evidence from 11 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 #12 (Supported); Grok 4.5 #7 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 4.5 share 11 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 10 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.7; 16 to Grok 4.5.
Updated July 18, 2026- Shared results
- 11
- Claude Opus 4.7 only
- 10
- Grok 4.5 only
- 16
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 4.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 11 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Claude Opus 4.7 is priced at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens for Grok 4.5. Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 500K for Grok 4.5.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | Δ | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agentic | Claude Opus 4.7Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Grok 4.583.3 |
| Coding | Claude Opus 4.7Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Grok 4.564.7 |
| Math | Claude Opus 4.738.6 | MarginNo overlap | Grok 4.5Not measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.5 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude Opus 4.7$5 input / $25 output | Grok 4.5$2 input / $6 output | Grok 4.5 has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude Opus 4.7Not available | Grok 4.5Not available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude Opus 4.7Not available | Grok 4.5Not available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude Opus 4.71M | Grok 4.5500K | Claude Opus 4.7 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic15 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.5 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 74% | — | Not comparable |
| Gert LabsSource | 65.59% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 20.7% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | 13.9% | — | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
| deepSweSource | — | 53% | Not comparable |
| AA Agentic IndexSource | — | 45.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 51.7% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 1535 | Not comparable |
| AA BriefcaseSource | — | 1323 | Not comparable |
| AA AutomationBenchSource | — | 51.4% | Not comparable |
| AA EnterpriseOps-GymSource | — | 40.8% | Not comparable |
| AA Harvey LABSource | — | 13.3% | Not comparable |
| AA Tau3 BankingSource | — | 32.6% | Not comparable |
| aaTerminalBench21Source | — | 81.6% | Not comparable |
Coding9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.5 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 71.00% | — | Not comparable |
| React Native EvalsSource | 82.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 50.1% | 54.1% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource | 38.5% | — | Not comparable |
| SWE-bench ProSource | — | 64.7% | Not comparable |
| SWE MultilingualSource | — | 78% | Not comparable |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0Source | — | 83.3% | Not comparable |
| cursorBench32Source | — | 66.7% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 72.5% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.5 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 42.7% | 53.8% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 88.5% | 93.1% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 31.2% | 40.3% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 14.2% | 26.4% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 43.5% | 52.1% | Grok 4.5 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 51.9% | 53.5% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
Math2 benchmarks
Multimodal2 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Grok 4.5 | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 43.6% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 4.5 on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Opus 4.7 and Grok 4.5 today?
Claude Opus 4.7: $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens Grok 4.5: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.