Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.5

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 3 shared benchmark results across 2 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

71.94/100
Margin
13.3pts
← winning
Xiaomi
58.62/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 #12 (Supported); MiMo-V2.5 #62 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5 share 3 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.7; 8 to MiMo-V2.5.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
3
Claude Opus 4.7 only
18
MiMo-V2.5 only
8
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 3 shared benchmark results across 2 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5
CategoryClaude Opus 4.7ΔMiMo-V2.5
AgenticClaude Opus 4.7Not measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.565.8
CodingClaude Opus 4.7Not measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.556.1
MathClaude Opus 4.738.6MarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.5Not measured
MultimodalClaude Opus 4.7Not measuredMarginNo overlapMiMo-V2.579.0

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Opus 4.7$5 input / $25 outputMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Opus 4.7Not availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Opus 4.7Not availableMiMo-V2.5Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Opus 4.71MMiMo-V2.51MListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Result
τ²-bench resultsSource 74%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 65.59%46.89%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
ResearchClawBenchSource 20.7%16.9%Claude Opus 4.7 leads
OSWorld 2.0Source 13.9%Not comparable
Claw-EvalSource 62.3%Not comparable
MM-ClawBenchSource 23.8%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Result
Vibe Code BenchSource 71.00%Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 82.8%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 50.1%Not comparable
FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource 38.5%Not comparable
SWE-bench ProSource 56.1%Not comparable
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 65.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Result
AA-LCRSource 67.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 5.1%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 42.7%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 88.5%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 31.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource 14.2%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 43.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 51.9%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 43.793%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 22.917%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Result
AA-MMMU-ProSource 76.4%Not comparable
Design Arena WebsiteSource 13251291Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Video-MME (with subtitle)Source 87.7%Not comparable
CharXivSource 81%Not comparable
MMMU-ProSource 77.9%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7MiMo-V2.5Result
AA-IFBenchSource 43.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Opus 4.7 and MiMo-V2.5 today?

Claude Opus 4.7: $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens MiMo-V2.5: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.