Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B
Head-to-head evidence from 12 shared benchmark results across 6 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 #15 (Supported); Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B #159 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Claude Opus 4.7 and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B share 12 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 9 results are unique to Claude Opus 4.7; 17 to Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Updated July 27, 2026- Shared results
- 12
- Claude Opus 4.7 only
- 9
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B only
- 17
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Claude Opus 4.7 and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 12 shared benchmark results across 6 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
Claude Opus 4.7 is priced at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B. Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger context window at 1M, compared with 256K for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Claude Opus 4.7 | Δ | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | Claude Opus 4.7Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B32.0 |
| Knowledge | Claude Opus 4.7Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Math | Claude Opus 4.738.6 | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot measured |
| Multimodal | Claude Opus 4.7Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B76.3 |
| Inst. Following | Claude Opus 4.7Not measured | MarginNo overlap | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B74.2 |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Claude Opus 4.7$5 input / $25 output | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B$0 input / $0 output | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Claude Opus 4.7Not available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete speed comparison is not available. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Claude Opus 4.7Not available | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3BNot available | A complete latency comparison is not available. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Claude Opus 4.71M | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B256K | Claude Opus 4.7 lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic7 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench resultsSource | 74% | 45.3% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
| Gert LabsSource | 65.59% | — | Not comparable |
| ResearchClawBenchSource | 20.7% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorld 2.0Source | 13.9% | — | Not comparable |
| OSWorldSource | — | 47.4% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 0.0% | Not comparable |
| GDPval-AASource | — | 465 | Not comparable |
Coding6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vibe Code BenchSource | 71.00% | — | Not comparable |
| React Native EvalsSource | 82.8% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-SciCodeSource | 50.1% | 27.8% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
| FrontierCode 1.1 MainSource | 38.5% | — | Not comparable |
| SciCodeSource | — | 32% | Not comparable |
| AA Coding IndexSource | — | 13.8% | Not comparable |
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 42.7% | 14.9% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 88.5% | 46.9% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
| AA-HLESource | 31.2% | 5.3% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | 14.2% | -56.0% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 43.5% | 14.8% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 51.9% | 83.1% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
| MMLU-ProSource | — | 77.3% | Not comparable |
| GPQASource | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| GPQA-DSource | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
Math3 benchmarks
Multimodal9 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-MMMU-ProSource | 76.4% | 53.2% | Claude Opus 4.7 leads |
| Design Arena WebsiteSource | 1320 | — | Not comparable |
| MMMUSource | — | 70.8% | Not comparable |
| MMLongBench-DocSource | — | 57.5% | Not comparable |
| CharXivSource | — | 76.3% | Not comparable |
| ScreenSpot ProSource | — | 57.8% | Not comparable |
| Video-MME (w/o subtitle)Source | — | 72.2% | Not comparable |
| AI2D_TESTSource | — | 88.5% | Not comparable |
| RefCOCO (avg)Source | — | 90.5% | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Claude Opus 4.7 and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Claude Opus 4.7 and Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B today?
Claude Opus 4.7: $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Know when it’s worth switching models
The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.
One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.