Skip to main content
benchlm.ai

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.5 397B

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.7

93

VS

Qwen3.5 397B

66

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.7 #2 · Qwen3.5 397B #8

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.7
74.9vs56.2

+18.7 difference

Coding

Claude Opus 4.7
72.9vs60.3

+12.6 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.7
68.2vs65.2

+3.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.7

Qwen3.5 397B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$0 / $0

Speed

N/A

96 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

2.44s

Context Window

1M

128K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.7 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5 397B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Opus 4.7 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 66. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.7's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 74.9 against 56.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MCP Atlas, 77.3% to 46.1%.

Claude Opus 4.7 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Qwen3.5 397B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.7 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 128K for Qwen3.5 397B.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.5 397B?

Claude Opus 4.7 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 66. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MCP Atlas, where the scores are 77.3% and 46.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.5 397B?

Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 68.2 versus 65.2. Inside this category, HLE is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.5 397B?

Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72.9 versus 60.3. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.5 397B?

Claude Opus 4.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.9 versus 56.2. Inside this category, MCP Atlas is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Qwen3.5 397B vs Qwen3.5 397B (Reasoning)Claude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Mythos PreviewClaude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.1 ProClaude Opus 4.7 vs Claude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.4 ProClaude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.3 CodexClaude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think

Explore More

Anthropic Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: April 16, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.