Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.4 nano

Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.8

93

VS

GPT-5.4 nano

60

3 categoriesvs0 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.8 #3 · GPT-5.4 nano unranked

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.8
80.1vs42.9

+37.2 difference

Knowledge

Claude Opus 4.8
70.1vs53.2

+16.9 difference

Multimodal

Claude Opus 4.8
76.1vs66.1

+10.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.8

GPT-5.4 nano

Price (per 1M tokens)

$5 / $25

$0.2 / $1.25

Speed

N/A

191 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

3.64s

Context Window

1M

400K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. GPT-5.4 nano only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.

Claude Opus 4.8 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 93 to 60. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.8's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 80.1 against 42.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OSWorld-Verified, 83.4% to 39%.

Claude Opus 4.8 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.20 input / $1.25 output per 1M tokens for GPT-5.4 nano. That is roughly 20.0x on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.8 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 400K for GPT-5.4 nano.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (4)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Claude Opus 4.8 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 93 to 60. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OSWorld-Verified, where the scores are 83.4% and 39%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.1 versus 53.2. Inside this category, HLE w/o tools is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.1 versus 42.9. Inside this category, GDPval-AA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4 nano?

Claude Opus 4.8 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 76.1 versus 66.1. GPT-5.4 nano stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 28, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.