Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3.1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

53.61/100
Margin
0.0pts
winning →
53.64/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.5 #96 (Estimated); DeepSeek V3.1 #95 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3.1 share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Claude Sonnet 4.5; 11 to DeepSeek V3.1.

Updated July 20, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
11
DeepSeek V3.1 only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3.1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is priced at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3.1. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.1.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3.1
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5ΔDeepSeek V3.1
AgenticClaude Sonnet 4.555.4MarginNo overlapDeepSeek V3.1Not measured
CodingClaude Sonnet 4.577.2MarginNo overlapDeepSeek V3.1Not measured
ReasoningClaude Sonnet 4.513.6MarginNo overlapDeepSeek V3.1Not measured
KnowledgeClaude Sonnet 4.583.4MarginNo overlapDeepSeek V3.1Not measured
MathClaude Sonnet 4.511.2MarginNo overlapDeepSeek V3.1Not measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V3.1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5$3 input / $15 outputDeepSeek V3.1$0 input / $0 outputDeepSeek V3.1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 4.5Not availableDeepSeek V3.1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 4.5Not availableDeepSeek V3.1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5200KDeepSeek V3.1128KClaude Sonnet 4.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V3.1Result
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 61.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 17.0%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 48.51%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 27.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 34.8%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V3.1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 36.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V3.1Result
ARC-AGI-2Source 13.6%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 45.0%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V3.1Result
GPQASource 83.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 21.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 73.5%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 6.3%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -41.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 23.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 83.5%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V3.1Result
AIME 2025Source 87%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 13.495%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V3.1Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 12221155Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5DeepSeek V3.1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 37.8%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3.1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and DeepSeek V3.1 today?

Claude Sonnet 4.5: $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens DeepSeek V3.1: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 20, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.