Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
53.61/100
Margin
31.8pts
← winning
21.78/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.5 #96 (Estimated); Gemini 1.0 Pro #193 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 12 results are unique to Claude Sonnet 4.5; 4 to Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
12
Gemini 1.0 Pro only
4
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 1.0 Pro is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 1.0 ProComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5$3 input / $15 outputGemini 1.0 ProNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 4.5Not availableGemini 1.0 ProNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 4.5Not availableGemini 1.0 ProNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5200KGemini 1.0 Pro32KClaude Sonnet 4.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 1.0 ProResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 61.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 17.0%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 48.51%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 27.7%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 1.0 ProResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.2%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 11.7%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 1.0 ProResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 13.6%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 1.0 ProResult
GPQASource 83.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 3.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 27.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 4.6%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 1.0 ProResult
AIME 2025Source 87%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 13.495%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Gemini 1.0 ProResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1219Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 1.0 Pro on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Gemini 1.0 Pro today?

Claude Sonnet 4.5: $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens Gemini 1.0 Pro: Pricing unavailable Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.