Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs GPT-OSS 20B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 1 shared benchmark result across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

53.61/100
Margin
10.9pts
← winning
42.74/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Sonnet 4.5 #96 (Estimated); GPT-OSS 20B #159 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-OSS 20B share 1 comparable benchmark result. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 11 results are unique to Claude Sonnet 4.5; 17 to GPT-OSS 20B.

Updated July 22, 2026
Shared results
1
Claude Sonnet 4.5 only
11
GPT-OSS 20B only
17
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-OSS 20B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 1 shared benchmark result across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is priced at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for GPT-OSS 20B. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for GPT-OSS 20B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-OSS 20B
CategoryClaude Sonnet 4.5ΔGPT-OSS 20B
AgenticClaude Sonnet 4.555.4MarginNo overlapGPT-OSS 20BNot measured
CodingClaude Sonnet 4.577.2MarginNo overlapGPT-OSS 20BNot measured
ReasoningClaude Sonnet 4.513.6MarginNo overlapGPT-OSS 20BNot measured
KnowledgeClaude Sonnet 4.583.4MarginNo overlapGPT-OSS 20BNot measured
MathClaude Sonnet 4.511.2MarginNo overlapGPT-OSS 20BNot measured

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-OSS 20BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5$3 input / $15 outputGPT-OSS 20B$0 input / $0 outputGPT-OSS 20B has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Sonnet 4.5Not availableGPT-OSS 20B313 tok/sA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Sonnet 4.5Not availableGPT-OSS 20B0.65 sA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Sonnet 4.5200KGPT-OSS 20B128KClaude Sonnet 4.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-OSS 20BResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 50%Not comparable
OSWorld-VerifiedSource 61.4%Not comparable
VITA-BenchSource 17.0%Not comparable
Gert LabsSource 48.51%Not comparable
JobBenchSource 27.7%Not comparable
AA Agentic IndexSource 3.1%Not comparable
APEX-Agents-AASource 0.7%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 60.2%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 3.0%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 559Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-OSS 20BResult
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 77.2%Not comparable
React Native EvalsSource 71%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 20.7%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 34.4%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-OSS 20BResult
ARC-AGI-2Source 13.6%Not comparable
AA-LCRSource 30.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 1.4%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-OSS 20BResult
GPQASource 83.4%Not comparable
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 14.9%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 68.8%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 9.8%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -63.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 15.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 94.1%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-OSS 20BResult
AIME 2025Source 87%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 13.495%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 4.167%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-OSS 20BResult
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1219882Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-OSS 20BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 65.1%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-OSS 20B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and GPT-OSS 20B today?

Claude Sonnet 4.5: $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens GPT-OSS 20B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 22, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.