Model comparison
Command A+ vs o3-pro
Head-to-head evidence from 2 shared benchmark results across 1 category. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.
Public leaderboard positions: Command A+ #133 (Estimated); o3-pro #124 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.
Evidence parity. Command A+ and o3-pro share 2 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 18 results are unique to Command A+; 0 to o3-pro.
Updated July 17, 2026- Shared results
- 2
- Command A+ only
- 18
- o3-pro only
- 0
- Comparable categories
- 0 / 8
Benchmark data for Command A+ and o3-pro is coming soon on BenchLM.
Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 2 shared benchmark results across 1 evidence category; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.
Why this result
BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.
o3-pro is priced at $20.00 input / $80.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $2.50 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens for Command A+. o3-pro has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Command A+.
Category breakdown
Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.
| Category | Command A+ | Δ | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multimodal | Command A+59.3 | MarginNo overlap | o3-proNot measured |
Operational comparison
Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.
| Metric | Command A+ | o3-pro | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokens | Command A+$2.5 input / $10 output | o3-pro$20 input / $80 output | Command A+ has the lower combined listed price. |
| Generation speedtokens per second | Command A+272 tok/s | o3-pro27 tok/s | Command A+ has the higher measured throughput. |
| First-answer latencyseconds to first token | Command A+0.25 s | o3-pro84.93 s | Command A+ reaches the first token sooner. |
| Context windowmaximum listed tokens | Command A+128K | o3-pro200K | o3-pro lists the larger context window. |
Benchmark Deep Dive
Agentic4 benchmarks
Coding3 benchmarks
Reasoning2 benchmarks
Knowledge6 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Command A+ | o3-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource | 22.5% | 32.5% | o3-pro leads |
| AA-GPQA DiamondSource | 76.1% | 84.5% | o3-pro leads |
| AA-HLESource | 11.4% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience IndexSource | -4.0% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience AccuracySource | 8.9% | — | Not comparable |
| AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource | 14.1% | — | Not comparable |
Multimodal4 benchmarks
Inst. Following1 benchmarks
| Benchmark | Command A+ | o3-pro | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA-IFBenchSource | 73.9% | — | Not comparable |
Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Can I compare Command A+ and o3-pro on BenchLM yet?
Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.
Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?
BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.
What data is available for Command A+ and o3-pro today?
Command A+: $2.50 input / $10.00 output per 1M tokens o3-pro: $20.00 input / $80.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.
Related Comparisons
Explore More
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
A weekly brief for engineers and researchers covering new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.