Skip to main content
BenchLM
Advertise

Model comparison

Composer 2.5 vs Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
N/A
0 category wins0 category wins

Evidence parity. Composer 2.5 and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Composer 2.5; 0 to Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Composer 2.5 only
5
Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF only
0
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Composer 2.5 and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Composer 2.5 is priced at $0.50 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF. Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF has the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for Composer 2.5.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricComposer 2.5Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensComposer 2.5$0.5 input / $2.5 outputHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF$0 input / $0 outputHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondComposer 2.5Not availableHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenComposer 2.5Not availableHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensComposer 2.5200KHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF262KHolo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkComposer 2.5Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 69.3%—Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkComposer 2.5Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUFResult
Terminal-Bench 2.0Source 69.3%—Not comparable
SWE MultilingualSource 79.8%—Not comparable
cursorBench31Source 63.2%—Not comparable
cursorBench32Source 56.1%—Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Composer 2.5 and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Composer 2.5 and Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF today?

Composer 2.5: $0.50 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens Holo3.1-35B-A3B-GGUF: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Explore More

Cursor Compare Pricing Methodology Find Your Best LLM Overall Rankings
Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.