Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 79 to 62. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 78.8 against 61.7.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think gives you the larger context window at 2M, compared with 200K for Composer 2.
Pick Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Composer 2 only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Composer 2
61.7
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think
78.8
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think is ahead overall, 79 to 62.
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.8 versus 61.7. Composer 2 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.