Composer 2 vs Mistral Large 2

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Composer 2 has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 62 versus 59. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.

Composer 2's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 61.7 against 52.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 61.7% to 51%.

Composer 2 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Mistral Large 2 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Composer 2 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Mistral Large 2.

Quick Verdict

Pick Composer 2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mistral Large 2 only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Agentic

Composer 2

Composer 2

61.7

Mistral Large 2

52.2

61.7%
Terminal-Bench 2.0
51%
Coming soon
BrowseComp
57%
Coming soon
OSWorld-Verified
50%

Coding

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

73.7%
SWE Multilingual
Coming soon
97.2%
React Native Evals
Coming soon
Coming soon
HumanEval
60%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
49%
Coming soon
LiveCodeBench
38%
Coming soon
SWE-bench Pro
44%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMMU-Pro
56%
Coming soon
OfficeQA Pro
67%

Reasoning

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MuSR
64%
Coming soon
BBH
82%
Coming soon
LongBench v2
66%
Coming soon
MRCRv2
68%

Knowledge

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MMLU
68%
Coming soon
GPQA
68%
Coming soon
SuperGPQA
66%
Coming soon
MMLU-Pro
74%
Coming soon
HLE
12%
Coming soon
FrontierScience
65%
Coming soon
SimpleQA
66%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
IFEval
83%

Multilingual

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
MGSM
81%
Coming soon
MMLU-ProX
78%

Mathematics

Coming soon

Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.

Coming soon
AIME 2023
68%
Coming soon
AIME 2024
70%
Coming soon
AIME 2025
69%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2023
64%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2024
66%
Coming soon
HMMT Feb 2025
65%
Coming soon
BRUMO 2025
67%
Coming soon
MATH-500
82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Composer 2 or Mistral Large 2?

Composer 2 is ahead overall, 62 to 59. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 61.7% and 51%.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Composer 2 or Mistral Large 2?

Composer 2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.7 versus 52.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 18, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.