Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Composer 2
~62
Winner · 1/8 categoriesSarvam 105B
60
0/8 categoriesComposer 2· Sarvam 105B
Pick Composer 2 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Sarvam 105B only becomes the better choice if you want the cheaper token bill.
Composer 2 has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 62 versus 60. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Composer 2's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 61.7 against 49.5.
Composer 2 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.50 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens for Sarvam 105B. That is roughly Infinityx on output cost alone. Composer 2 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Sarvam 105B.
BenchLM keeps the benchmark table and the operator tradeoffs on the same page so a better score does not hide a materially slower, pricier, or smaller-context model.
Runtime metrics show N/A when BenchLM does not have a sourced snapshot for that exact model. The scoring rules and freshness policy are documented on the methodology page.
| Benchmark | Composer 2 | Sarvam 105B |
|---|---|---|
| AgenticComposer 2 wins | ||
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 61.7% | — |
| BrowseComp | — | 49.5% |
| Coding | ||
| SWE Multilingual | 73.7% | — |
| React Native Evals | 96.2% | — |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | — | 71.7% |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 45% |
| Multimodal & Grounded | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| gpqaDiamond | — | 78.7% |
| hle | — | 11.2% |
| Knowledge | ||
| MMLU | — | 90.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81.7% |
| Instruction Following | ||
| IFEval | — | 84.8% |
| Multilingual | ||
| Coming soon | ||
| Mathematics | ||
| MATH-500 | — | 98.6% |
| AIME 2025 | — | 88.3% |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | — | 85.8% |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | — | 85.8% |
Composer 2 is ahead overall, 62 to 60.
Composer 2 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 61.7 versus 49.5. Sarvam 105B stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.