Skip to main content

Model comparison

Cosmos3-Edge vs Hy3

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
N/A
No comparison
Tencent
55.64/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Cosmos3-Edge unranked (Not scored); Hy3 #80 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Cosmos3-Edge and Hy3 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to Cosmos3-Edge; 14 to Hy3.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Cosmos3-Edge only
0
Hy3 only
14
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Cosmos3-Edge and Hy3 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM does not have sourced benchmark coverage for Cosmos3-Edge yet. This comparison is currently limited to metadata such as context window, reasoning mode, and pricing where available.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricCosmos3-EdgeHy3Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensCosmos3-Edge$0 input / $0 outputHy3$0 input / $0 outputListed prices are equal.
Generation speedtokens per secondCosmos3-EdgeNot availableHy3Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenCosmos3-EdgeNot availableHy3Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensCosmos3-Edge256KHy3256KListed context windows are equal.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkCosmos3-EdgeHy3Result
AA Agentic IndexSource 30.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 35.7%Not comparable
GDPval-AASource 1214Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkCosmos3-EdgeHy3Result
AA-SciCodeSource 47.6%Not comparable
AA Coding IndexSource 58.8%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkCosmos3-EdgeHy3Result
AA-LCRSource 66.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 4.9%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkCosmos3-EdgeHy3Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 41.2%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 89.7%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 31.6%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -18.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.5%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 73.0%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkCosmos3-EdgeHy3Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1229Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Cosmos3-Edge and Hy3 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Cosmos3-Edge and Hy3 today?

Cosmos3-Edge: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Hy3: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.