Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Llama 3.1 405B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 65 to 32. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Llama 3.1 405B gives you the larger context window at 128K, compared with 32K for DBRX Instruct.
Pick Llama 3.1 405B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DBRX Instruct only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Llama 3.1 405B
58.7
DBRX Instruct
73.7
Llama 3.1 405B
48.3
DBRX Instruct
70.1
Llama 3.1 405B is ahead overall, 65 to 32. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 62 and 70.1.
DBRX Instruct has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.7 versus 58.7. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DBRX Instruct has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.1 versus 48.3. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.