Qwen2.5-VL-32B vs DBRX Instruct

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Qwen2.5-VL-32B is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 41 to 32. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen2.5-VL-32B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DBRX Instruct only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.

Knowledge

DBRX Instruct

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

36.3

DBRX Instruct

73.7

43
MMLU
73.7
42
GPQA
-
40
SuperGPQA
-
38
OpenBookQA
-
53
MMLU-Pro
-
2
HLE
-

Coding

DBRX Instruct

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

21

DBRX Instruct

70.1

35
HumanEval
70.1
17
SWE-bench Verified
-
11
LiveCodeBench
-

Mathematics

Qwen2.5-VL-32B
43
AIME 2023
-
45
AIME 2024
-
44
AIME 2025
-
39
HMMT Feb 2023
-
41
HMMT Feb 2024
-
40
HMMT Feb 2025
-
42
BRUMO 2025
-
59
MATH-500
-

Reasoning

Qwen2.5-VL-32B
41
SimpleQA
-
39
MuSR
-
61
BBH
-

Instruction Following

Qwen2.5-VL-32B
67
IFEval
-

Multilingual

Qwen2.5-VL-32B
63
MGSM
-

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Qwen2.5-VL-32B or DBRX Instruct?

Qwen2.5-VL-32B is ahead overall, 41 to 32. The biggest single separator in this matchup is HumanEval, where the scores are 35 and 70.1.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Qwen2.5-VL-32B or DBRX Instruct?

DBRX Instruct has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 73.7 versus 36.3. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Qwen2.5-VL-32B or DBRX Instruct?

DBRX Instruct has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 70.1 versus 21. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 9, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.