DeepSeek Coder 2.0 vs GLM-4.7-Flash

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

DeepSeek Coder 2.0 wins overall with a score of 64 vs 56 (8 point difference).DeepSeek Coder 2.0 wins 4 out of 4 categories.

Knowledge

DeepSeek Coder 2.0

DeepSeek Coder 2.0

77.8

GLM-4.7-Flash

63.8

80
MMLU
66
79
GPQA
65
77
SuperGPQA
63
75
OpenBookQA
61

Coding

DeepSeek Coder 2.0

DeepSeek Coder 2.0

82

GLM-4.7-Flash

58

82
HumanEval
58

Mathematics

DeepSeek Coder 2.0

DeepSeek Coder 2.0

80

GLM-4.7-Flash

65

81
AIME 2023
66
83
AIME 2024
68
82
AIME 2025
67
77
HMMT Feb 2023
62
79
HMMT Feb 2024
64
78
HMMT Feb 2025
63
80
BRUMO 2025
65

Reasoning

DeepSeek Coder 2.0

DeepSeek Coder 2.0

77

GLM-4.7-Flash

62

78
SimpleQA
63
76
MuSR
61

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek Coder 2.0 or GLM-4.7-Flash?

DeepSeek Coder 2.0 scores higher overall with 64 vs 56, a difference of 8 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek Coder 2.0 or GLM-4.7-Flash?

DeepSeek Coder 2.0 leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 77.8 vs 63.8.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek Coder 2.0 or GLM-4.7-Flash?

DeepSeek Coder 2.0 leads in coding with an average score of 82 vs 58.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek Coder 2.0 or GLM-4.7-Flash?

DeepSeek Coder 2.0 leads in math with an average score of 80 vs 65.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek Coder 2.0 or GLM-4.7-Flash?

DeepSeek Coder 2.0 leads in reasoning with an average score of 77 vs 62.