DeepSeek LLM 2.0 vs Qwen2.5-VL-32B

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.

Quick Verdict

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 wins overall with a score of 63 vs 34 (29 point difference).DeepSeek LLM 2.0 wins 4 out of 4 categories.

Knowledge

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

76.8

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40.8

79
MMLU
43
78
GPQA
42
76
SuperGPQA
40
74
OpenBookQA
38

Coding

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

73

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

35

73
HumanEval
35

Mathematics

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

79

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

42

80
AIME 2023
43
82
AIME 2024
45
81
AIME 2025
44
76
HMMT Feb 2023
39
78
HMMT Feb 2024
41
77
HMMT Feb 2025
40
79
BRUMO 2025
42

Reasoning

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

DeepSeek LLM 2.0

76

Qwen2.5-VL-32B

40

77
SimpleQA
41
75
MuSR
39

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, DeepSeek LLM 2.0 or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 scores higher overall with 63 vs 34, a difference of 29 points across all benchmarks.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, DeepSeek LLM 2.0 or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 leads in knowledge tasks with an average score of 76.8 vs 40.8.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek LLM 2.0 or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 leads in coding with an average score of 73 vs 35.

Which is better for math, DeepSeek LLM 2.0 or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 leads in math with an average score of 79 vs 42.

Which is better for reasoning, DeepSeek LLM 2.0 or Qwen2.5-VL-32B?

DeepSeek LLM 2.0 leads in reasoning with an average score of 76 vs 40.