Skip to main content

Model comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Gemma 4 12B

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 6 shared benchmark results across 4 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

42.58/100
Margin
4.7pts
winning →
47.29/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B #160 (Estimated); Gemma 4 12B #137 (Estimated). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 4 12B share 6 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 0 results are unique to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B; 17 to Gemma 4 12B.

Updated July 23, 2026
Shared results
6
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B only
0
Gemma 4 12B only
17
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 4 12B is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 6 shared benchmark results across 4 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Gemma 4 12B has the larger context window at 256K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

Category breakdown

Exact category averages are shown below. Not measured means BenchLM does not have enough sourced public coverage for that model and category.

Category scores and score margins for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 4 12B
CategoryDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BΔGemma 4 12B
ReasoningDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapGemma 4 12B43.4
KnowledgeDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapGemma 4 12B77.5
MathDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapGemma 4 12B77.5
MultimodalDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BNot measuredMarginNo overlapGemma 4 12B69.1

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BGemma 4 12BComparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B$0 input / $0 outputGemma 4 12BNot availableA complete price comparison is not available.
Generation speedtokens per secondDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B60 tok/sGemma 4 12BNot availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B0.84 sGemma 4 12BNot availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B128KGemma 4 12B256KGemma 4 12B lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BGemma 4 12BResult
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.3%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BGemma 4 12BResult
AA-SciCodeSource 37.6%38.2%Gemma 4 12B leads
Reasoning
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BGemma 4 12BResult
AA-LCRSource 9.7%55.3%Gemma 4 12B leads
BBHSource 53%Not comparable
MRCRv2Source 43.4%Not comparable
CritPtSource 0.0%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BGemma 4 12BResult
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 11.0%22.0%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 61.5%75.3%Gemma 4 12B leads
AA-HLESource 5.5%14.8%Gemma 4 12B leads
GPQASource 78.8%Not comparable
GPQA-DSource 78.8%Not comparable
MMLU-ProSource 77.2%Not comparable
HLE w/o toolsSource 5.2%Not comparable
MMMLUSource 83.4%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -51.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 16.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 80.8%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BGemma 4 12BResult
AIME26Source 77.5%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BGemma 4 12BResult
MMMU-ProSource 69.1%Not comparable
MathVisionSource 79.7%Not comparable
MedXpertQA (MM)Source 48.7%Not comparable
AA-MMMU-ProSource 69.7%Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BGemma 4 12BResult
AA-IFBenchSource 22.9%73.5%Gemma 4 12B leads
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 4 12B on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemma 4 12B today?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B: $0.00 input / $0.00 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 23, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.